Now that the readers of this column have some historical perspective of the entire Cauvery water dispute between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu, it would make better sense to tackle the problems and advantages that Karnataka faces with the final award.
Even as the politicians and some sections of the media indulge in competitive parochialism based less on facts and more on emotions, one needs to look at this issue as objectively as possible. Now is the final award unfair to Karnataka? This is an obvious question that has been dogging the minds of all fair-minded citizens in the State and outside. Read More...
Showing posts with label Tamil Nadu. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tamil Nadu. Show all posts
Thursday, February 22, 2007
Monday, February 19, 2007
Whom can Karnataka blame in the Cauvery dispute? History! - Part 1
Is it the end of a dispute or the beginning of a fresh one? This is the question, which has been haunting one's mind, ever since the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal came up with its final award, nearly 17 years after its formation, earlier this week.
As the Cauvery River ebbed and flowed during the last 25 years, sometimes giving bountiful water and sometimes making people thirst for a few drops, the two States at the centre of the dispute, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, have also reacted accordingly. Read More...
As the Cauvery River ebbed and flowed during the last 25 years, sometimes giving bountiful water and sometimes making people thirst for a few drops, the two States at the centre of the dispute, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, have also reacted accordingly. Read More...
Labels:
article,
Cauvery,
columnist,
Girish Nikam,
government,
india,
indiainteracts,
interacts,
karnataka,
politics,
Tamil Nadu,
tribunal,
water dispute
Saturday, February 10, 2007
Cauvery--News Analysis
Many positives amidst few negatives in Cauvery Order for Karnataka
Despite the strong reactions from Karnataka politicians across the spectrum to the final order of the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal, and the demand for its review, there are several positives which emerge out of it, apart from the few negatives.
One of the positives is that Karnataka will now be allowed to store and utilise surplus water in the basin, after it ensures the flow of 192 thousand million cubic feet (tmc ft) to Tamil Nadu. This would mean that Karnataka would have to build another reservoir at the border of the two States. The place talked about for long is Mekedatu, where Karnataka will not be able to produce power, but only store surplus water and also ensure efficient drinking water supply to Bangalore and its neighbouring towns. Read More...
Despite the strong reactions from Karnataka politicians across the spectrum to the final order of the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal, and the demand for its review, there are several positives which emerge out of it, apart from the few negatives.
One of the positives is that Karnataka will now be allowed to store and utilise surplus water in the basin, after it ensures the flow of 192 thousand million cubic feet (tmc ft) to Tamil Nadu. This would mean that Karnataka would have to build another reservoir at the border of the two States. The place talked about for long is Mekedatu, where Karnataka will not be able to produce power, but only store surplus water and also ensure efficient drinking water supply to Bangalore and its neighbouring towns. Read More...
Labels:
article,
Cauvery,
columnist,
Girish Nikam,
government,
india,
indiainteracts,
interacts,
karnataka,
national,
river,
Tamil Nadu,
water dispute
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)